Twelve connected modules sharing the same asset, control and risk model.
Put security operations inside your GRC model.
Both platforms publish connected workflows for risk, compliance, incidents, suppliers, policies and continuity. STORM stands out when that operating model must also include dedicated phishing exercises, threat intelligence, security monitoring, maritime workflows and a path to discuss on-premise deployment.
Source-backed comparison · Formalize information links to Formalize's official website and help center · Reviewed 30 September 2026
Connected compliance and GRC with configurable workflows across governance and resilience.
When GRC must see the security picture.
STORM is designed for teams that want governance data and operational security context to work together—from asset cartography and risk to endpoint evidence, threat intelligence and board reporting.
GRC plus security operations
Threat intelligence, phishing exercises and security monitoring sit alongside compliance, risk, audits, incidents and continuity.
Platform scopeA defined risk journey
STORM publishes a five-phase path from cartography and assessment through treatment, third parties and continuous compliance monitoring.
Operational methodMaritime-ready operations
STORM publishes shore, fleet and per-vessel workflows mapped to IMO MSC.428(98) and IACS UR E26/E27.
Sector-specific scopeA deployment discussion path
STORM publishes EU-hosted SaaS and offers on-premise deployment discussions for strict data-locality requirements.
Deployment choiceWhere STORM is the more operational fit.
Formalize publishes substantial GRC and resilience capabilities. This focused comparison therefore highlights only the areas where STORM documents a distinct operational choice.
This is a focused view of STORM's published differentiators, not a complete feature inventory. It does not imply that an unlisted Formalize capability is unavailable; validate requirements in current demonstrations and contracts.
From asset context to security action.
STORM's differentiator is the route from governance data to security context: the same asset and risk model supports assessment, monitoring, threat awareness and executive reporting.

Start with the operational environment, not the checklist.
STORM ties cartography, impact and threat assessment to risk scenarios, treatments and residual risk, keeping framework activity connected to the underlying exposure.
- Asset and dependency cartography
- Impact, threat and vulnerability assessment
- Risk register, scenarios and treatment plans
- Heatmaps and executive risk reporting

Bring external exposure into the risk conversation.
Threat intelligence, CVE and DNS monitoring give security and governance teams additional context for assessment, prioritization and follow-up.
- FortiRecon threat intelligence integration
- CVE monitoring and security advisories
- DNS and external exposure monitoring
- Context that supports risk prioritization

Let operational signals support the audit trail.
Supported MDM and EDR integrations can pre-populate endpoint posture, configuration state and asset attributes. Remediation tasks and findings can then move through the connected governance workflow.
- Endpoint posture and asset attributes
- Evidence mapped to relevant controls
- External supplier ratings in context
- Tasks synchronized with team workflows
What should you validate?
Bring your actual assets, risk method, threat sources, evidence workflows, reporting needs and deployment constraints to the STORM demonstration.
Is STORM only a compliance assessment tool?
Does STORM include threat intelligence and phishing workflows?
Does STORM offer an on-premise option?
Why choose STORM for a connected security and GRC program?
Bring your workflows. We'll show the operating model.
Use a 30-minute session to test STORM against your assets, risks, controls, threat sources, reporting needs and deployment constraints.
